HANSON v. BEZOS et al
BARON KEITH JOHNNY HANSON, JR. |
MAKENZIE BEZOS, JEFF BEZOS and BILL GATES |
2:2023cv00509 |
February 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
WENDY BEETLESTONE |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #4 TO PLAINTIFF ON 2/15/23. (jaa, ) Modified on 2/15/2023 (jaa, ). |
Filing 4 ORDERED that:1. Hansons Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED because, after a thorough review of the information he has provided about his income and assess, the Court finds that he has sufficient ability to pay the $350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee to commence this case. 2. If Hanson seeks to proceed with this case, he shall remit $402 to the Clerk of Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. etc.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 2/14/2023.2/14/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. MAILED TO HANSON. (fdc) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JEFF BEZOS, MAKENZIE BEZOS, BILL GATES, filed by BARON KEITH JOHNNY HANSON, JR. (IFP PENDING) (fdc) (Main Document 2 replaced on 2/9/2023) (lisad, ). |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by BARON KEITH JOHNNY HANSON, JR..(fdc) (Main Document 1 replaced on 2/9/2023) (lisad, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.