MARTINEZ v. OLIVER et al
| OSCAR MARTINEZ |
| LONNIE OLIVER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2023cv00762 |
| February 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Copy of Doc. 5 mailed to Pro Se. (mas) |
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT #1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE INSTANT PETITION IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. ROBINSON V. JOHNSON, 313 F.3D 128, 139-40 (3D CIR. 2002). THERE IS NO CAUSE FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 3/6/23. 3/6/23 ENTERED. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va)
|
| Notice of Pro Se Guidelines (#4) mailed to Martinez. (fdc) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (fdc) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 200006996 SCI ALBION (fdc) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 200006996.), filed by OSCAR MARTINEZ. *(IFP ALSO FILED -PENDING)(fdc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by OSCAR MARTINEZ..(fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
