BOUNTS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
| BOUNTS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. |
| CONNECTIFY, INC. and DOES 1-100 |
| 2:2023cv00890 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MIA ROBERTS PEREZ |
| Property Rights: Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE OF TODD E. ZENGER IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MIA ROBERTS PEREZ ON 3/13/2023.3/13/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(sg)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Todd E. Zenger ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-16551015.) filed by BOUNTS TECHNOLOGIES LTD..Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(BORNEMAN, RYAN) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by BOUNTS TECHNOLOGIES LTD..(BORNEMAN, RYAN) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CONNECTIFY, INC.. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL on 3/9/2023 (sg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CONNECTIFY, INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16548544.), filed by BOUNTS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form)(BORNEMAN, RYAN) (Attachment 2 replaced on 3/9/2023) (sbt). Modified on 4/7/2023 (afm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
