BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC v. THE NEAT COMPANY, INC.
| BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC |
| THE NEAT COMPANY, INC. |
| 2:2023cv01254 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| KELLEY BRISBON HODGE |
| Property Rights: Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter dated May 16, 2023 by BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC. (BERMAN, W.) |
Filing 8
ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT THE NEAT COMPANY, INC.' S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF' S COMPLAINT, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT SHALL HAVE UNTIL JUNE 12, 2023 TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KELLEY BRISBON HODGE ON 5/1/23.5/1/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by THE NEAT COMPANY, INC..Uncontested Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(GORMAN, JOHN) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC re: David A. Buchler served Summons and Complaint upon THE NEAT COMPANY, INC. by Personal Service. THE NEAT COMPANY, INC. served on 4/6/2023, answer due 4/27/2023. (DEBRUIN, DAVID) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE #4 IS GRANTED; AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KELLEY BRISBON HODGE ON 4/6/23.4/10/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED, MAILED TO UNREP.(bw) Modified on 4/11/2023 (bw).
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Cortney S. Alexander, Esq. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-16606933.) filed by BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC.Proposed Order, Certificate of Counsel, and Certificate of Service.(DEBRUIN, DAVID) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to THE NEAT COMPANY, INC.. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 4/3/23 (bw) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC.(DEBRUIN, DAVID) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16599604.), filed by BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Designation Form, #9 Appearance of Counsel, #10 Summons (unsigned), #11 Patent/Trademark Report)(DEBRUIN, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC v. THE NEAT COMPANY, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC | |
| Represented By: | DAVID WALTER DEBRUIN |
| Represented By: | COURTNEY S. ALEXANDER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE NEAT COMPANY, INC. | |
| Represented By: | JOHN V. GORMAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
