MILLER v. SOLOMON
| OMAR MILLER |
| BOBBY JO SOLOMON |
| 2:2023cv01256 |
| March 30, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| SCOTT W REID |
| JOHN M YOUNGE |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Memorandum of Law and Facts Supporting Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by OMAR MILLER, Certificate of Services. (mbh) |
| MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #7 TO PETITIONER ON 4/25/23. (jaa, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER THAT THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SHALL ENTER ITS APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS UPON RECEIPT OF THIS ORDER. THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS TO THE CLAIMS IN PETITIONER'S HABEAS PETITION. THE CLERK FOR THE COURT OF OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS ETC. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCOTT W. REID ON 4/24/23. 4/24/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(mbh)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE SCOTT W. REID, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 4/21/23. 4/21/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(mbh)
|
| DOC. NO. #6 MAILED TO PRO SE ON 4/21/23. (amas) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 20008694 (sbt) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Election filed by OMAR MILLER. (mbh) |
| Copy of Order #3 with IFP short form mailed to Petitioner (lvj) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO FURNISH MR. MILLER WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF MILLER INTENDS TO CONTINUE WITH HIS CASE AS FILED, MILLER IS DIRECTED TO RETURN THE NOTICE OF ELECTIONS FORM ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER. IF MILLER FAILS TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE NOTICE OF ELECTION FORM TO THE COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, THE COURT WILL RULE ON THE CURRENT PETITION, AS FILED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 4/3/23. 4/3/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(mbh) Modified on 4/4/2023 (lvj).
|
| Document #2 Mailed to: Omar Miller. (DT) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. (mbh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED BY OMAR MILLER. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP)(mbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MILLER v. SOLOMON | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: OMAR MILLER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: BOBBY JO SOLOMON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
