HAGEN v. THE GIANT COMPANY LLC
| Maureen Hagen |
| The Giant Company d/b/a Giant Food Stores and THE GIANT COMPANY LLC doing business as GIANT FOOD STORES |
| 2:2023cv01299 |
| April 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MAUREEN HAGEN. THE GIANT COMPANY LLC waiver sent on 4/5/2023, answer due 6/5/2023. (STANZIONE, JOHN) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by MAUREEN HAGEN re #1 Complaint (Attorney) (STANZIONE, JOHN) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to THE GIANT COMPANY LLC. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL on 4/5/2023 (sg) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Form is missing the required signature. (sbt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Giant Company d/b/a Giant Food Stores ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16606980.), filed by Maureen Hagen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(STANZIONE, JOHN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
