ARAOYE v. THE UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE et al
| SAMUEL O ARAOYE |
| THE UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, JOSEPH HARRISON, STEPHANIE NIEMI and DENNIS JEMMERSON |
| 2:2023cv01341 |
| April 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| WENDY BEETLESTONE |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS DUPLICATIVE OF CA NO. 23-1331, ETC. CLERK OF COURT SHALL CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 4/12/23. 4/12/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
|
| Filing 4 REQUEST TO CORRECT CAPTION by SAMUEL O ARAOYE. *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED* (Attachments: #1 COVER LETTER)(rf, ) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBITS by SAMUEL O ARAOYE.. *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED* (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(rf, ) |
| DOC. NO. 2, ALONG WITH REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY FORM, MAILED TO PRO SE ON 4/10/2023. (md) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (rf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOSEPH HARRISON, DENNIS JEMMERSON, STEPHANIE NIEMI, THE UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, filed by SAMUEL O ARAOYE., EXHIBITS *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED* (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 LETTER)(rf, ) Modified on 4/12/2023 (md). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
