Lomax-Moore v. VisionQuest National, LTD.
Plaintiff: Kahlil Lomax-Moore
Defendant: VisionQuest National, LTD.
Case Number: 2:2023cv01401
Filed: April 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CYNTHIA M RUFE
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by MARIA V. GO on behalf of VisionQuest National, LTD. with Certificate of Service(GO, MARIA)
April 28, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL P. RAUSCH on behalf of VisionQuest National, LTD. with Certificate of Service(RAUSCH, MICHAEL)
April 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS IN THE CONTROLLING COMPLAINT ASSERT A CLAIM FOR RECOVERY OF DAMAGES FOR PHYSICAL OR EMOTIONAL ABUSE THAT IS NOT SEXUAL IN NATURE, ALL SUCH CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED AS BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 4/28/23. 4/28/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) Modified on 4/28/2023 (rf, ).
April 28, 2023 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by VisionQuest National, LTD..(VALENTINI, GERALD)
April 28, 2023 Filing 7 STIPULATION by VisionQuest National, LTD.. (VALENTINI, GERALD)
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT VISIONQUEST NATIONAL LTD, TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED TO 5/2/23; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 4/17/23. 4/17/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
April 17, 2023 Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by VisionQuest National, LTD.. (Feenane, J.D.)
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT PURSUANT TO FRCP 42(a) THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTIONS ARE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE ACTIONS PREVIOUSLY CONSOLIDATED BEFORE THE HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH UNDER 21-4801, FOR PURPOSES OF RESOLVING ALL MATTERS PRIOR TO TRIAL. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 4/14/23. 4/17/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
April 12, 2023 Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by VisionQuest National, LTD..(VALENTINI, GERALD)
April 12, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by J.D. Feenane on behalf of VisionQuest National, LTD. with Certificate of Service(Feenane, J.D.)
April 12, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by VisionQuest National, LTD. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16623117), filed by VisionQuest National, LTD..(VALENTINI, GERALD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lomax-Moore v. VisionQuest National, LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kahlil Lomax-Moore
Represented By: MARTIN G. RUBENSTEIN
Represented By: DAVID WESLEY CORNISH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VisionQuest National, LTD.
Represented By: J.D. Feenane
Represented By: GERALD J. VALENTINI
Represented By: MARIA V. GO
Represented By: MICHAEL P. RAUSCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?