ZHANG v. CLIFFORD et al
HUOFA MICHAEL ZHANG |
JUDGE DANIEL CLIFFORD and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2023cv01433 |
April 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOSHUA D WOLSON |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to DANIEL CLIFFORD, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. MAILED To: PLAINTIFF on 5/5/23. (jaa, ) |
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 20009175 (jaa, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, PLAINTIFF MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 4/18/23. 4/18/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER WITH FORMS.(jaa, ) |
DOC 2 MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DANIEL CLIFFORD, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, filed by HUOFA MICHAEL ZHANG. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 COVER LETTER)(bw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.