RODRIGUEZ v. TARGET et al
| JACQUELINE RODRIGUEZ |
| TARGET, TARGET BRANDS, INC., TARGET STORES and TARGET CORPORATION |
| 2:2023cv01520 |
| April 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MICHAEL M BAYLSON |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
STIPULATION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 5/1/23. 5/1/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(va)
|
| Copy of #6 Remand Order faxed to CCP Philadelphia. (va) |
| Filing 5 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. (rf, ) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT by TARGET CORPORATION. (GREY, FRANCIS) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by TARGET CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(GREY, FRANCIS) |
| Filing 2 Letter re: Arbitration Certification (Attachments: #1 Arbitration Certification Form)(sbt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TARGET CORPORATION (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16641063), filed by TARGET CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Designation Form)(GREY, FRANCIS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
