BROADNAX v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| STEVEN BROADNAX |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT., PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and SHANDA WHITE |
| 2:2023cv01533 |
| April 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER THAT BROADNAXS CASE IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B)(II). 2. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. 3. IF BROADNAX DID NOT INTEND TO STAND ON HIS COMPLAINT, HE MUST MOVE FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS ORDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(E), AND ATTACH HIS PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT TO THAT MOTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/13/23. 6/14/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
| NON PRISONER COMPLAINT PACKAGE MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. 2. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. 3. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM AS FOLLOWS: A. THE CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANTS THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, AND SHANDA WHITE ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. B. THE CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANT THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TERMINATE THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, AND SHANDA WHITE AS DEFENDANTS. 5. BROADNAX MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ANY AMENDED COMPLAINT MUST IDENTIFY ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE CAPTION OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ADDITION TO IDENTIFYING THEM IN THE BODY OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SHALL STATE THE 2 BASIS FOR BROADNAXS CLAIMS AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT SHALL BE A COMPLETE DOCUMENT THAT DOES NOT RELY ON THE INITIAL COMPLAINT OR OTHER PAPERS FILED IN THIS CASE TO STATE A CLAIM. BROADNAX MAY NOT REASSERT A CLAIM THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. WHEN DRAFTING HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT, BROADNAX SHOULD BE MINDFUL OF THE COURTS REASONS FOR DISMISSING THE CLAIMS IN HIS INITIAL COMPLAINT WITH REGARD TO THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AS EXPLAINED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. 6. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND BROADNAX A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT STANDARD FORM TO BE USED BY A SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT FILING A CIVIL ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. BROADNAX MAY USE THIS FORM TO FILE HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT IF HE CHOOSES TO DO SO. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 4/26/23. 4/26/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 4/26/23. 4/26/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jaa, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT., PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, SHANDA WHITE, filed by STEVEN BROADNAX. *IFP PENDING. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by STEVEN BROADNAX.(jaa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
