SPANN v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
ANTOINE SPANN |
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, TIMOTHY HOLMER, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, JOHN E. WETZEL, LEE J. ESTOCK, PHONICIA D.W. WALLACE, DEREK R. OBERLANDER, ESQ. EMILY PINANDER, LAURA FELPS, REBECCA FUHRAMN, MRS. PETERSON, L. REEHER, JENN WINTERS, E. BOX, L. BRADLEY, J. PURCELL and KERRI MOORE |
2:2023cv01566 |
April 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
KAI N SCOTT |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Notice of Pro Se Guidelines (#5) mailed to Spann. (fdc) |
Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. (mbh) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by ANTOINE SPANN. (mbh) |
Filing 3 Complaint against E. BOX, L. BRADLEY, LEE J. ESTOCK, LAURA FELPS, REBECCA FUHRAMN, TIMOTHY HOLMER, KERRI MOORE, DEREK R. OBERLANDER, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, PETERSON, EMILY PINANDER, J. PURCELL, L. REEHER, JOSH SHAPIRO, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHONICIA D.W. WALLACE, JOHN E. WETZEL and JENN WINTERS filed by ANTOINE SPANN. (mbh) |
Filing 2 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY ANTOINE SPANN. (mbh) |
Filing 1 Copy of Order dated 4/24/23 (C.A. No. 23-237) signed by Judge Murphy. (mbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.