PATEL v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
| MAHESHKUMAR BALDEVBHAI PATEL |
| U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and UR MENDOZA JADDOU |
| 2:2023cv01570 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD J PAPPERT |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by ANTHONY ST. JOSEPH on behalf of UR MENDOZA JADDOU, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES with Certificate of Service(ST. JOSEPH, ANTHONY) |
| Filing 3 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (JL) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to UR MENDOZA JADDOU, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. E-mailed to Christopher Casazza, Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office (with Complaint) on 4/25/23 (fdc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against UR MENDOZA JADDOU, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16647880.), filed by MAHESHKUMAR BALDEVBHAI PATEL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form Designation Form)(CASAZZA, CHRISTOPHER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
