ARMSTRONG v. OVERMYER et al
| SHAVONE ARMSTRONG |
| SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2023cv01781 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MARK A KEARNEY |
| CRAIG M STRAW |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOC 11 MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER THAT ATTORNEYS HANDLING THIS CASE FROM THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE SHALL ENTER AN APPEARANCE NO LATER THAN 7/12/23. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG M. STRAW ON 7/5/23. 7/5/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(rf, )
|
| DOC 11 EMAILED TO THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA (rf, ) |
| State Court Record on 6/28/2023, received by Judge Straw's Chamber's.(dc) |
| State Court Record received. Record sent to Chambers of Magistrate Judge Craig M. Straw. (fdc) |
| Filing 10 MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO GRANT DISCOVERY PRIOR TO EVIDENTIARY HEARING, PROOF OF SERVICE *ENVELOPE ATTACHED* filed by SHAVONE ARMSTRONG..(rf, ) |
| DOC 8 MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER THAT DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS WITHIN 60 DAYS AS OUTLINED HEREIN. PROTHONOTARY, CLERK OF COURT OR OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V ARMSTRONG, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA,CP-51-CR-11385-2016 WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG M. STRAW ON 5/24/23. 5/24/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(rf, )
|
| PETITION (DOC 2) AND ORDER (DOC. 9) EMAILED TO COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY & DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA (rf, ) |
| DOC. NO. #9 MAILED TO PRO SE ON 5/24/23. (amas) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER finding as moot #7 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/23/23.5/24/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO ARMSTRONG.(rf, ) (Main Document 8 replaced on 5/24/2023) (rf, ).
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER THAT WE REFER THE PETITION TO HONORABLE JUDGE CRAIG M. STRAW FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/23/23. 5/23/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(rf, )
|
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 20009679 (rf, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by SHAVONE ARMSTRONG..*envelope attached*(rf, ) |
| DOC 4 MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. PETITIONER MUST NO LATER THAN 6/15/23 PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/15/23.5/15/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO ARMSTRONG(rf, )
|
| PAPER #3 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES (rf, ) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by SHAVONE ARMSTRONG. *ENVELOPE ATTACHED*(rf, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by SHAVONE ARMSTRONG., ENVELOPE ATTACHED.(rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
