FRANKE v. GIANT FOOD STORES et al
| Wanda Frank and WANDA FRANKE |
| Giant Food Stores, individually and d/b/a Giant, Giant Food Stores, LLC, individually and d/b/a Giant, The Giant Company, individually, and d/b/a Giant, Giant Food Stores, Inc., individually, and d/b/a Giant, Ahold U.S.A., Inc., Courtney Jaindl, Lynsey Kouch, Thomas Wasko, Connie Periphery, GIANT FOOD STORES, INC. INDIVIDUALLY doing business as GIANT, GIANT FOOD STORES, LLC INDIVIDUALLY doing business as GIANT, THE GIANT COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY doing business as GIANT and GIANT FOOD STORES INDIVIDUALLY doing business as GIANT |
| 2:2023cv01902 |
| May 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to AHOLD U.S.A., INC., GIANT FOOD STORES, GIANT FOOD STORES, INC., GIANT FOOD STORES, LLC, COURTNEY JAINDL, LYNSEY KOUCH, CONNIE PERIPHERY, THE GIANT COMPANY, THOMAS WASKO. E-mailed to Seth D. Carson on 5/19/23 (fdc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16700599.), filed by Wanda Frank. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(CARSON, SETH) (Attachment 2 replaced on 5/19/2023) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
