MCCRAY, III v. SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P.
CHARLES MCCRAY, III |
SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. D/B/A RIVERS CASINO PHILADELPHIA and SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. doing business as RIVERS CASINO PHILADELPHIA |
2:2023cv01960 |
May 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
CHAD F KENNEY |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by CHARLES MCCRAY, III. SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. waiver sent on 5/26/2023, answer due 7/25/2023. (MACEY, CHRISTOPHER) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT COUNSEL CONTEMPLATING FILING A MOTION SHALL FIRST CONTACT OPPOSING COUNSEL TO DISCUSS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CONTEMPLATED MOTION AND TO PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CURE ANY ALLEGED PLEADING DEFICIENIES OR STRIKE CERTAIN MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 5/24/23. 5/24/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. Forwarded To: counsel on 5/24/23. (mbh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. D/B/A RIVERS CASINO PHILADELPHIA ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16709479.), filed by CHARLES MCCRAY, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(MACEY, CHRISTOPHER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.