BRYANT v. BEST BUY IMPORTS
Plaintiff: SHANICQUA BRYANT
Defendant: BEST BUY IMPORTS
Case Number: 2:2023cv02026
Filed: May 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: WENDY BEETLESTONE
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3731 Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 30, 2023 COPY OF DOC. NO. 3 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw)
May 24, 2023 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. (mbh)
May 24, 2023 Filing 2 Complaint against BEST BUY IMPORTS filed by SHANICQUA BRYANT. (mbh)
May 24, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY SHANICQUA BRYANT.(mbh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRYANT v. BEST BUY IMPORTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHANICQUA BRYANT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BEST BUY IMPORTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?