GRANDOIT v. PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT et al
GARDIEU GRANDOIT and GARDIEU-GEEZ |
PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT, HONORABLE MARGARET THERESA MURPHY, HONORABLE JOEL T JOHNSON, DIONNE KEMONA TAYLOR, WAYNE BENETT, KATIE GALLEN, CHARLES CARLIN, GEORGE TWARDY and VERONICA MACKIN |
2:2023cv02119 |
June 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MOTION, REPRESENTATION OF PLEADING AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT, filed by GARDIEU GRANDOIT.. (Attachments: #1 PROOF OF SERVICE)(sg) |
Filing 13 RULE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDERAND NOW, this 20th day of July 2023, upon consideration of Plaintiff Gardieu Grandoits (Plaintiff) pro se complaint and other filings, it appears that this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over some or all of Plaintiffs claims in this matter. As such, this Rule is hereby issued for Plaintiff to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3). Accordingly, by August 2, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a response to this Rule which provides the following information: a short, plain, concise, and separate statement of Plaintiffs claim(s) against each Defendant and the basis of this Courts subject-matter jurisdiction over each such claim. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 7/20/2023. 7/21/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. MAILED TO UNREPS. (sg) Modified on 7/26/2023 (sg). |
Filing 12 ORDER THAT upon consideration of the various motions filed by Plaintiff Gardieu Grandoit, [ECF 3, 6, 7, 10, and 11], it is hereby ORDERED that the motions, [ECF 3, 6, 7, 10, and 11], are DENIED, as premature.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 7/19/2023.7/20/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. MAILED TO UNREPS. (sg) Modified on 7/26/2023 (sg). |
Filing 11 MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE TO A COURT OF RECORD TO PROCEED BY COMMON LAW AS REQUIRED BY DUE PROCESS THE LAW OF THE LAND, filed by GARDIEU GRANDOIT..(sg) |
Filing 10 MOTION, CHALLENGE OF JURISDICTION, filed by GARDIEU GRANDOIT..(sg) |
Filing 9 Pro Se E-Notice Consent Form by GARDIEU GRANDOIT consenting to e-notice at YAHWEHLION@ICLOUD.COM (sg) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF EXTORTION OR ATTEMPTED EXTORTION, by GARDIEU GRANDOIT (sg) |
Filing 7 MOTION CHALLENGE OF JURISDICTION, filed by GARDIEU GRANDOIT..(sg) |
Filing 6 MOTION filed by GARDIEU GRANDOIT, NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED.(rf, ) Modified on 6/29/2023 (lisad, ). |
MAILED OUT PRO SE GUIDELINES AND SUMMONS TO PLAINTIFF ON 6/7/23. (jaa, ) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to WAYNE BENETT, CHARLES CARLIN, KATIE GALLEN, JOEL T JOHNSON, VERONICA MACKIN, MARGARET THERESA MURPHY, PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT, DIONNE KEMONA TAYLOR, GEORGE TWARDY. (rf, ) (Main Document 5 replaced on 6/6/2023) (rf, ). (Main Document 5 replaced on 6/7/2023) (lisad, ). |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (rf, ) |
Filing 3 Motion to Appeal Family Court decision filed by GARDIEU GRANDOIT. *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED*.(rf, ) Modified on 6/6/2023 (lisad, ). |
Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 20009903 (rf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WAYNE BENETT, CHARLES CARLIN, KATIE GALLEN, JOEL T JOHNSON, VERONICA MACKIN, MARGARET THERESA MURPHY, PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT, DIONNE KEMONA TAYLOR, GEORGE TWARDY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 20009903.), filed by GARDIEU GRANDOIT. *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED*(rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.