KHAN v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
Plaintiff: RAHMAT KHAN
Defendant: U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and SUSAN RAUFER
Case Number: 2:2023cv02132
Filed: June 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EDUARDO C ROBRENO
Referring Judge: JOHN M YOUNGE
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #6 GOVERNMENT REQUEST TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY 11/13/2023.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 8/3/23. 8/3/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(va)
August 3, 2023 Filing 6 Letter to Chambers dated 8/2/23 from the Government Requesting Extension to Respond to Complaint. (va)
August 2, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by MANSI SHAH on behalf of UR MENDOZA JADDOU, SUSAN RAUFER, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES with Certificate of Service(SHAH, MANSI)
July 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO TO HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 07/11/2023. 07/11/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nd)
June 14, 2023 Filing 3 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (va)
June 5, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to UR MENDOZA JADDOU, SUSAN RAUFER, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. E-mailed to Christopher M. Casazza, U.S. Attorney's Office on 6/5/23 (fdc)
June 5, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against UR MENDOZA JADDOU, SUSAN RAUFER, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16732939.), filed by RAHMAT KHAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form Designation Form)(CASAZZA, CHRISTOPHER)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KHAN v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RAHMAT KHAN
Represented By: CHRISTOPHER M. CASAZZA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Represented By: MANSI SHAH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Represented By: MANSI SHAH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUSAN RAUFER
Represented By: MANSI SHAH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?