WOODS v. TERRA et al
RUSSELL D. WOODS |
SUPERINTENDENT J. TERRA, LIEUTENANT C. HARTLESS, JAMES C. BARNACLE, SGT. BATTY, C.O.1 WENDLERHOUSE, JOHN/JANE DOE 1 and HEARING EXAMINER J. YODIS |
2:2023cv02178 |
June 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 US Marshal 285 Form. (amas) |
Filing 9 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service by RUSSELL D. WOODS. (amas) |
Filing 8 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to KEVIN R. STEELE on 7/5/23 by RUSSELL D. WOODS. Waiver of Service due by 8/9/2023. (amas) |
Filing 7 Status Report on Request for USM 285 Form (amas) |
Copy of Order #5 mailed to Woods. (fdc) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to JAMES C. BARNACLE, BATTY, C. HARTLESS, J. TERRA, WENDLERHOUSE, J. YODIS. Forwarded To: US MARSHALS on 6/28/23 (amas) |
|
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 20010515 SCI HOUTZDALE (amas) |
DOC. NO. #3 ALONG WITH IFP FORMS MAILED TO PRO SE ON 6/15/23. (amas) |
|
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (MAILED TO PRO SE)(amas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAMES C. BARNACLE, BATTY, C. HARTLESS, JOHN/JANE DOE 1, J. TERRA, WENDLERHOUSE, J. YODIS, filed by RUSSELL D. WOODS.(FEE NOT PAID. NO IFP FILED)(amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.