HUGHES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Anthony Hughes |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Officer John Doe(s) (I-XX), Individually and as Officers for the City of Philadelphia and OFFICER JOHN DOE(S) (I-XX) |
2:2023cv02186 |
June 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JUAN R SANCHEZ |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER THAT FOR REASONS OUTLINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH LEAVE TO PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS I, II, III, V AND VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNT IV IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND COUNT VI IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE WITH RESPECT TO THE JOHN DOES IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/28/23. 7/28/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/28/23. 7/28/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh) |
Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Certificate of Service filed by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. (WALSH, DANIELLE) |
Filing 7 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. (amas) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by ANTHONY HUGHES. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(IGWE, EMEKA) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA SHALL HAVE UNTIL 7/24/23 TO FILE A REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/5/23. 7/6/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION re #3 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Extension of Time to File Response to July 7, 2023) by ANTHONY HUGHES. (IGWE, EMEKA) |
Filing 3 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA.Memorandum of Law and Certificate of Service.(WALSH, DANIELLE) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA re Attorney Required Forms,, Revised Civil Cover Sheet, with Revised Designation Form (Attachments: #1 Designation Form Revised Case Designation Form)(WALSH, DANIELLE) |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. DEFENDANT's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED CIVIL COVER SHEET AND DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Cover Sheet has nothing checked off. The Jurisdiction and Citizenship sections, the Nature of Suit and Origin have to be answered. The Related Case section is not filled out. The Yes/No questions and question asking if the case is/is not related needs to be answered. Civil box needs to be checked off as well. (sbt) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA with Certificate of Service (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16740382), filed by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form, #4 Exhibit Writ, #5 Exhibit Complaint, #6 Exhibit Notice to Prothonotary)(WALSH, DANIELLE) (Attachment 1 replaced on 6/8/2023) (sbt). (Attachment 3 replaced on 6/8/2023) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.