MOSLEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| JAMES MOSLEY |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and DANIEL J. ANDERS |
| 2:2023cv02248 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MIA ROBERTS PEREZ |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re #6 Notice of Appeal filed by JAMES MOSLEY. USCA Case Number 23-2443 (amas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL by JAMES MOSLEY. IFP GRANTED. Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA, Appeals Clerk. (amas) |
| Filing 5 MEMORADNUM ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MIA ROBERTS PEREZ ON 8/4/23. 8/4/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. (amas) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MIA ROBERTS PEREZ ON 8/4/23. 8/4/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. (amas) |
| COPY OF DOC. NO. 3 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against DANIEL J. ANDERS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, filed by JAMES MOSLEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(bw) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JAMES MOSLEY..(bw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
