KAMARA v. PHILADELPHIA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, et al
| FATMATA KAMARA |
| PHILADELPHIA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, DOUG KAISER, MICHELE MAKLEY, JANE DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 1 |
| 2:2023cv02305 |
| June 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M YOUNGE |
| Other Statutes: Banks and Banking |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by FATMATA KAMARA (NDUKA, CHRISTIAN) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by FATMATA KAMARA re #1 Complaint (IFP or Government Plaintiff) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(NDUKA, CHRISTIAN) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to DOUG KAISER, MICHELE MAKLEY, PHILADELPHIA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION. Forwarded To: Christian C. Nduka on 6/20/23 (fdc) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED CIVIL COVER SHEET AND DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Both Forms are missing. (sbt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOUG KAISER, MICHELE MAKLEY, JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 1, filed by FATMATA KAMARA (Filing Fee $402, Receipt Number 20010317).(NDUKA, CHRISTIAN) Modified on 6/20/2023 (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
