SEALS v. BRITTAIN et al
| DARRYL SEALS |
| KATHY BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPLHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2023cv02323 |
| June 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| CRAIG M STRAW |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Letter dated 7/18/23 Re: Status Update (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(sbt) |
| Filing 5 Letter dated 7/8/23 by DARRYL SEALS (sbt) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 5, 28 U.S.C. FOL. 2254. IF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FINDS THAT ANY CLAIM IS UNTIMELY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2244(D), HE OR SHE MAY FOREGO A DISCUSSION OF THE MERITS OF SUCH CLAIM AND FOCUS THE ARGUMENT REGARDING THAT CLAIM SOLELY ON TIMELINESS. AS REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. 3771(B)(2), THE COMMONWEALTH IS FURTHER ORDERED TO ENSURE THAT IN A FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF A STATE CONVICTION, ANY CRIME VICTIMS ARE AFFORDED THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE CRIMES VICTIMS ACT, AS AMENDED JULY 27, 2006. 2. PETITIONER MAY, IF HE CHOOSES, FILE A REPLY TO THE RESPONDENTS ANSWER WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE RESPONDENTS ANSWER IS FILED. 3. THE PROTHONOTARY, CLERK OF COURT, OR OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST-CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTERS OF COMMONWEALTH V. SEALS, CP-51-CR-0003047-2013, CP-51-CR-0003049-2013, & CP-51-CR-0003051-2013, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG M. STRAW ON 6/27/23. 6/27/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND EMAILED TO CCP PHILADELPHIA.(jaa, ) Modified on 6/27/2023 (jaa, ).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDERED AS FOLLOWS THAT THIS ACTION IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE CRAIG M. STRAW, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 2. PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 72.1.IV(C), ALL ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND NEW ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL NOT BE RAISED AFTER THE FILING OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IF THEY COULD HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. 3. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PETITION TO THE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY AND THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 6/26/23. 6/27/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
| COPY OF PETITION #1 AND ORDER #3 FORWARDED BY EMAIL TO THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ON 6/27/23. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by KARL DAVID SCHWARTZ on behalf of DARRYL SEALS with Certificate of Service(SCHWARTZ, KARL) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Consolidated Memorandum of Law ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number APAEDC-16760361.), filed by darryl seals. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form)(SCHWARTZ, KARL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
