WILLIAMS v. DOOLEY et al
| MALIK WILLIAMS |
| P/O PATRICK DOOLEY, LARRY KRASNER, PHILADELPHIA POLICE 15TH DISTRICT and LEWANDOWSKI 3RD |
| 2:2023cv02348 |
| June 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD A MCHUGH |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 US Marshal Return. Initial Notice Mailed 7/19/2023. (bw) |
| COPY OF DOC. NOS. 6 AND 7 HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to PATRICK DOOLEY. EMAILED To: US MARSHALS on 7/17/23. (jaa, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. 2. MALIK WILLIAMS, #QP=5567, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B), REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE. THE COURT DIRECTS THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI CHESTER OR OTHER APPROPRIATE OFFICIAL TO ASSESS AN INITIAL FILING FEE OF 20% OF THE GREATER OF (A) THE AVERAGE MONTHLY DEPOSITS TO WILLIAMSS INMATE ACCOUNT; OR (B) THE AVERAGE MONTHLY BALANCE IN WILLIAMSS INMATE ACCOUNT FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE FILING OF THIS CASE. THE SUPERINTENDENT OR OTHER APPROPRIATE OFFICIAL SHALL CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND FORWARD THE INITIAL PAYMENT ASSESSED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER TO THE COURT WITH A REFERENCE TO THE DOCKET NUMBER FOR THIS CASE. IN EACH SUCCEEDING MONTH WHEN THE AMOUNT IN WILLIAMSS INMATE TRUST FUND ACCOUNT EXCEEDS $10.00, THE SUPERINTENDENT OR OTHER APPROPRIATE OFFICIAL SHALL FORWARD PAYMENTS TO THE CLERK OF COURT EQUALING 20% OF THE PRECEDING MONTHS INCOME CREDITED TO WILLIAMSS INMATE ACCOUNT UNTIL THE FEES ARE PAID. EACH PAYMENT SHALL REFER TO THE DOCKET NUMBER FOR THIS CASE. 2 3. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI CHESTER. 4. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 7/17/23. 7/17/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO SUPERINTENDENT SCI CHESTER. *NOT MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, )
|
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 7/17/23. 7/17/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, ) Modified on 7/17/2023 (jaa, ). |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by MALIK WILLIAMS. (amas) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING FAILED TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT, AS REQUIRED, PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS CANNOT BE ADJUDICATED AT THIS TIME. PLAINTIFF SHALL, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT. ALTERNATIVELY PLAINTIFF CAN PROCEED BY SUBMITTING $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 6/22/23. 6/22/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. (amas)
|
| Notice of Pro Se Guidelines (#3) mailed to Williams. (fdc) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE)(amas) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against PATRICK DOOLEY, LARRY KRASNER, LEWANDOWSKI 3RD, PHILADELPHIA POLICE 15TH DISTRICT, filed by MALIK WILLIAMS.(amas) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MALIK WILLIAMS.(amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
