U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. HAJOCA CORPORATION
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION |
HAJOCA CORPORATION |
2:2023cv02460 |
June 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
CHAD F KENNEY |
Civil Rights: Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER THAT THE JOINT MOTION #7 , THE COURT FINDS THAT IT SHOULD BE, AND IT IS HEREBY, GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED THAT THIS ACTION BE, AND IT IS HEREBY, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE COURT HEREBY RETAINS JURISDICTION OVER THIS ACTION AND THE PARTIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF ENFORCING THE TERMS OF THE PARTIES PRODUCTION AGREEMENT RESOLVING SUBPOENA ENFORCEMENT ACTION AND THE COURTS CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 7/13/23. 7/13/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw) |
Filing 8 STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER: PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES JOINT REQUEST THAT THE COURT ENTER THIS STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER IMPOSING THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS TO DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION PRODUCED PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES PRODUCTION AGREEMENT RESOLVING SUBPOENA ENFORCEMENT ACTION IN THE PRESENT LITIGATION (THE AGREEMENT), AND GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN; AS IT IS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 7/13/23. 7/13/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment filed by U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Anderson, Delaney) |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Protective Order filed by U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Stipulated Confidentiality Order)(Anderson, Delaney) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service re: served Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 4), EEOC's Application for an Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 1), EEOC's Memorandum of Law in Support (ECF No. 1-1), Exhibits 1-8 (ECF Nos. 1-2 through 1-9), Proposed Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 1-10), and Proposed Order Enforcing Subpoena (ECF No. 1-11) upon Ms. Katharine J. Liao, counsel of record for Respondent Hajoca Corporation (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ronald L. Phillips)(Anderson, Delaney) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT PETITIONER EEOC SHALL SERVE RESPONDENT, THROUGH ITS COUNSEL OF RECORD, WITH A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, THE APPLICATION ON WHICH THE ORDER IS BASED AND THE PLEADINGS AND EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION NO LATER THAN 3 DAYS AFTER THE DATE THAT THE COURT ENTERED THIS ORDER, AND FILE A PROOF OF SERVICE IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 4(1) OF THE FRCP. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE RESPONDENT MUST FILE AND SERVE ITS RESPONSE AS TO WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT ORDER COMPLIANCE WITH THE SUBPOENA NOT LATER THAN 7/12/23. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL PARTIES MUST APPEAR AT A HEARING BEFORE THIS COURT ON 7/14/23 AT 10:30 AM IN COURTROOM 11B BEFORE HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 6/30/23. 6/30/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (mbh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Designation Form (Anderson, Delaney) |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. All of the Yes/No questions need to be answered. (sbt) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Civil Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Designation Form)(Anderson, Delaney) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION for Order to Show Cause Why U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Administrative Subpoena Should Not Be Enforced by U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Application for Order to Show Cause, #2 Exhibit 1 - Field Office Deputy Director Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 - Commissioner Charge, #4 Exhibit 3 - EEOC Subpoena WFO-2022-003, #5 Exhibit 4 - Notice of Charge, #6 Exhibit 5 - July 16, 2019 RFI, #7 Exhibit 6 - April 1, 2021 RFI, #8 Exhibit 7 - December 17, 2021 RFI, #9 Exhibit 8 - Subpoena Delivery Receipt, #10 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order to Show Cause, #11 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Enforcing Subpoena)(Anderson, Delaney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. HAJOCA CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION | |
Represented By: | RONALD L. PHILLIPS |
Represented By: | Delaney E. Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: HAJOCA CORPORATION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.