HANSEN v. VERTICAL CAPITAL INCOME FUND et al
| KRISTINA L HANSEN |
| VERTICAL CAPITAL INCOME FUND and STATEBRIDGE COMPANY LLC |
| 2:2023cv02496 |
| June 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Personal Property: Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to STATEBRIDGE COMPANY LLC and VERTICAL CAPITAL INCOME FUND. Forwarded To: counsel on 6/29/23 (mbh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STATEBRIDGE COMPANY LLC, VERTICAL CAPITAL INCOME FUND ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16783600.), filed by KRISTINA L HANSEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form Designation Form, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit Summons, #10 Exhibit Summons)(MASCIOCCHI, THOMAS) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Related Case section s blank. The Yes/No questions and Certification Question have to be answered. A signature is also required. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
