ABDUL AZIZ et al v. MURPHY et al
| HASSAN ABDUL AZIZ, ZEINA RIFAI and DR. HASSAN ABDUL AZIZ |
| SEAN MURPHY and ANTONY J. BLINKEN |
| 2:2023cv02764 |
| July 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JUAN R SANCHEZ |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (bw) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR, ATTORNEY JESSE M. BLESS for HASSAN ABDUL AZIZ, IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/24/23. 7/24/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)
|
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jesse M. Bless by HASSAN ABDUL AZIZ, ZEINA RIFAI. ( Filing fee $ 75 receipt number APAEDC-16828245.). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order for Application for Pro Hac Vice)(GALATI, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, SEAN MURPHY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 7/20/23. SUMMONS HAS BEEN E-MAILED TO AUSA ON 7/20/2023. (bw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16823757.), filed by HASSAN ABDUL AZIZ, ZEINA RIFAI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(GALATI, MATTHEW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
