MURPHY v. FLEMING et al
| DOUGLAS MURPHY |
| LEIGH FLEMING, ATTORNEY FITZGERALD, ATTORNEY ALVAREZ, ATTORNEY CIUMMO, FITZGERALD, ALVAREZ & CIUMMO, P.C., CALAVERAS COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE AND JANE/JOHN DOE EMPLOYEES 1-20, RICK DIBASILIO, CALAVERAS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPUTIES & DETECTIVES: JANE/JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20, CALAVERAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS: JANE/JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20, BARBARA M. YORK, DANA L. PFEIL, CALAVERAS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT OFFICIALS: JANE/JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20 and CALAVERAS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE STAFF: JANE/JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20 |
| 2:2023cv02855 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MICHAEL M BAYLSON |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCS 7 & 8 MAILED TO MURPHY (rf, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER THAT PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR THE COURT CLERK TO ASSIGN A COMPLEX LITIGATION LIAISON/CONTRACT PERSON #5 AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT #6 ARE DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 9/7/23.9/7/23 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO MURPHY. (fdc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND (1) THE MOTION FOR THE COURT CLERK TO ASSIGN A COMPLEX LITIGATION LIAISON/CONTACT PERSON #5 AND (2) THE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO APPOINT COUNSEL #6 , BOTH FILED ON 8/9/23, TO THE CLERK OF COURT FOR THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. MURPHY IS ADVISED TO FILE ALL FUTURE PLEADINGS RELATED TO THIS MATTER IN THAT COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 9/7/23. 9/7/23 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO MURPHY. (fdc)
|
| Motions 5 & 6 and Order #7 transferred to U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California via InterDistrictTransfer. (fdc) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint and to Appoint Counsel filed by DOUGLAS MURPHY.(fdc) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for the Court Clerk to Assign a Complex Litigation Liaison/Contact Person filed by DOUGLAS MURPHY.(fdc) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 1) SHALL BE LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE TRANSFEREE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/4/23. 8/4/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. (amas)
|
| CASE TRANSFERRED TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSFER ON 8/4/23. (amas) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. MAILED TO MURPHY. (fdc) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ALVAREZ, CALAVERAS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE STAFF: JANE/JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20, CALAVERAS COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE AND JANE/JOHN DOE EMPLOYEES 1-20, CALAVERAS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPUTIES & DETECTIVES: JANE/JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20, CALAVERAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS: JANE/JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20, CALAVERAS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT OFFICIALS: JANE/JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20, CIUMMO, RICK DIBASILIO, FITZGERALD, FITZGERALD, ALVAREZ & CIUMMO, P.C., LEIGH FLEMING, DANA L. PFEIL, BARBARA M. YORK, filed by DOUGLAS MURPHY. *IFP PENDING* (fdc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by DOUGLAS MURPHY..(fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
