LEAHY v. MURPHS INC. et al
MICHELE A. LEAHY |
MURPHS INC. a Pennsylvania corporation doing business as MURPHS BAR FISHTOWN, GREGORY W. WALTON and THERESA A. WALTON |
2:2023cv02867 |
July 27, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
ANITA B BRODY |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File Alternate Service of Complaint filed by MICHELE A. LEAHY.Alternate Service of Complaint.(WEITZ, BEN-ZION) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHELE A. LEAHY re: Moin Ahammed served Summons and Complaint upon MURPHS INC. by Personal Service. MURPHS INC. served on 8/2/2023, answer due 8/23/2023. (WEITZ, BEN-ZION) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Moin Ahammed re: served Complaint and Summons to MURPHS INC. upon Briana Gellagher, designated to accept service for MURPHS INC. by Personal service on 8/2/23 (WEITZ, BEN-ZION) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MURPHS INC., GREGORY W. WALTON, THERESA A. WALTON. Forwarded To: E-MAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 7/27/23 (JL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MURPHS INC., GREGORY W. WALTON, THERESA A. WALTON ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16840626.), filed by MICHELE A. LEAHY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(WEITZ, BEN-ZION) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.