WILLIAMS v. SORBER et al
| SHAWN WILLIAMS |
| JAIME SORBER, JOHN E. WETZEL and GEORGE M. LITTLE |
| 2:2023cv02982 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #6 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. SHAWN WILLIAMS, #KQ-2332, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B), REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI PHOENIX. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. COUNT VI OF THE COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF IS DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B)(I)-(II). THE CLERK OF COURT IS SPECIALLY APPOINTED TO SERVE WRITTEN WAIVER REQUESTS ON THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(D), TO EFFECT WAIVER OF SERVICE AT THE ADDRESSES LISTED ON THE FINAL PAGE OF THE COMPLAINT TITLED VERIFICATION: JAIME SORBER, JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE. THE WAIVER OF SERVICE REQUESTS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE COMPLAINT AND A COPY OF THIS ORDER, AND SHALL INFORM THE DEFENDANT(S) OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF COMPLIANCE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUESTS. IF A SIGNED WAIVER IS NOT RETURNED WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT GIVEN, THE COURT WILL ISSUE SUBSEQUENT ORDERS TO ATTEMPT TO EFFECT SERVICE BY THE U.S. MARSHAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH 28 U.S.C. 1915(D) AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(C)(3). THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED NOT TO ISSUE SUMMONSES UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THIS COURT. ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 9/29/23. 9/29/23 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va)
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by SHAWN WILLIAMS. Envelope. (va) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by SHAWN WILLIAMS. Envelope.(va) |
| MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #5 TO PLAINTIFF ON 9/7/23. (jaa, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #4 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE IFP OR PAY FEE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 9/6/23. 9/6/23 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va)
|
| Filing 4 SHAWN WILLIAMS MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MY INFORMA PAUPERIS PAPERS.(JL) |
| DOC. NO. 3, ALONG WITH IFP FORM, MAILED TO PRO SE ON 8/8/2023. (md) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING SUBMITTED COMPLAINT WITH THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, PLAINTIFF MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 8/7/23. 8/7/23 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va)
|
| DOC. NO. 2 MAILED TO PRO SE ON 8/7/2023. (md) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GEORGE M. LITTLE, JAIME SORBER, JOHN E. WETZEL, filed by SHAWN WILLIAMS. Envelope. FEE NOT PAID. NO IFP.(va) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by SHAWN WILLIAMS. (va) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
