SASSELLI v. LYFT INC. et al
| RICHARD SASSELLI |
| LYFT INC., MOKAROM HOSSAIN and JOHN DOE |
| 2:2023cv03103 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAUL S DIAMOND |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STANDING ORDER OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 8/29/2023. 8/30/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint together with with Affirmative Defenses by LYFT INC..(ANDRZEJEWSKI, JAMES) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by ALYSON M. SCIACCA on behalf of MOKAROM HOSSAIN (SCIACCA, ALYSON) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by BETH A. CARTER on behalf of MOKAROM HOSSAIN (CARTER, BETH) |
| Filing 3 State Court record received from Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. (CCP - Philadelphia County cv, ) |
| Filing 2 Letter re: Arbitration Certification (Attachments: #1 Arbitration Certification Form)(sbt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by LYFT INC. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16874480), filed by LYFT INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form, #4 Declaration, #5 Exhibit)(ANDRZEJEWSKI, JAMES) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/14/2023) (sbt). (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/14/2023) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
