NAIDU v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff: RAMARAO NAIDU
Defendant: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Case Number: 2:2023cv03179
Filed: August 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: MITCHELL S GOLDBERG
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PNCS REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHERSUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS, filed by PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. (sg)
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER THAT upon consideration of Defendant PNCBank, National Associations Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in Further Support of ItsMotion to Dismiss (the Motion) and any response thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED thatthe Motion is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Reply Brief attached to the Motion as Exhibit Ashall be deemed filed. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 10/12/2023.10/12/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File A REPLY BRIEF IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS filed by PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(FIDANZA, MARK)
September 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by RAMARAO NAIDU. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Denying Motion to Dismiss)(TUPITZA, JAMES)
September 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.Brief, Declaration, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Declaration of Alison Penrose)(FIDANZA, MARK)
September 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED that Defendant shall, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, file either a motion to dismiss or a responsive pleading. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 9/1/2023. 9/1/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Letter dated 08/28/2023 by RAMARAO NAIDU. (TUPITZA, JAMES)
August 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.(FIDANZA, MARK)
August 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Letter dated August 23, 2023 by PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. (FIDANZA, MARK)
August 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by PNC BANK, N.A. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16886057), filed by PNC BANK, N.A..(FIDANZA, MARK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NAIDU v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RAMARAO NAIDU
Represented By: JAMES S. TUPITZA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Represented By: MARK W. FIDANZA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?