EDWARDS v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY et al
CHARLES EDWARDS |
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, ART OF PAIN MANAGEMENT and KEVIN B. STEINBERG |
2:2023cv03289 |
August 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
KELLEY BRISBON HODGE |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, PLAINTIFF MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 8/31/2023. 8/31/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE WITH IFP APPLICATION.(sg) |
DOC. NO. #2 ALONG WITH PRO SE NOTICE CONSENT FORM WAS MAILED TO PRO SE ON 8/28/23. (amas) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE)(amas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ART OF PAIN MANAGEMENT, GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, KEVIN B. STEINBERG, filed by CHARLES EDWARDS.(FEE NOT PAID, NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 SUMMONS)(amas) |
Pro Se E-Notice Consent Form Mailed to Pro Se Litigant.(NOT MAILED) (amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.