FOFANA v. GARLAND et al
CHEICK FOFANA |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and UR MENDOZA JADDOU |
2:2023cv03544 |
September 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
KAREN S MARSTON |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by CHEICK FOFANA As To Complaint Seeking Writ of Mandamus(ISBELL, ALEX) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CHEICK FOFANA re: Steve Jaewook Sul served Summons and Complaint upon MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS by USPS Certified Mail. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Acceptance of Service, #2 Exhibit USPS Labels, #3 Exhibit Delivery Confirmation)(ISBELL, ALEX) Modified on 10/2/2023 (lisad, ). |
Filing 3 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (fdc) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General E-MAILED. To: COUNSEL on 9/14/23. SUMMONS E-MAILED TO AUSA ON 9/14/2023. (bw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16940112.), filed by Cheick Fofana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form Designation Form)(ISBELL, ALEX) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.