ULLAH v. JADDOU
| AHSAN ULLAH |
| U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and UR MENDOZA JADDOU |
| 2:2023cv03565 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CHAD F KENNEY |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by AHSAN ULLAH Completed Designation Form (Ryan, Brendan) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to UR MENDOZA JADDOU, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General E-mailed to: Brendan M. Ryan, Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office on 9/15/23 (fdc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16944602.), filed by Ahsan Ullah. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A: Plaintiff's I-918 Receipt Notice, #4 Exhibit B: Plaintiff's I-765 Receipt Notice)(Ryan, Brendan) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Civil Box needs to be checked off. (sbt) Modified on 9/14/2023 (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
