STYLES v. ORTIZ et al
TYREEK STYLES |
WARDEN ORTIZ, WARDEN MARLER, CAPTAIN NASH and SIS LT. O'BOIL |
2:2023cv03755 |
September 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOHN F MURPHY |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by TYREEK STYLES. (fdc) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by TYREEK STYLES..(fdc) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING SUBMITTED COMPLAINT WITH THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, PLAINTIFF MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 9/29/23. 9/29/23 ENTERED AND COPY MAILED TO STYLES.(fdc) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. MAILED TO STYLES. (fdc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WARDEN MARLER, CAPTAIN NASH, SIS LT. O'BOIL, WARDEN ORTIZ, filed by TYREEK STYLES. *FILING FEE NOT PAID; IFP NOT FILED* (fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.