UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. BODDIE
| UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| KEVIN BODDIE |
| 2:2023cv03780 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Intervene as Defendant filed by PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION.Memorandum. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Exhibit 1 - Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene, #2 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit 2 - Proposed Order Granting Motion to Intervene, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Proposed Motion to Dismiss, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Memorandum in Support of Proposed Motion to Dismiss, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 - Proposed Order Granting Proposed Motion to Dismiss)(Brubaker, John) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Meredith Ann Millard on behalf of PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION with Certificate of Service(Millard, Meredith) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. re #1 Complaint (Attorney), Designation Form (SIMMONS, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to KEVIN BODDIE. Forwarded To: E-MAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 9/28/23 (JL) |
| Filing 3 Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion to Compel Arbitration re #1 Complaint (Attorney), by UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion to Compel Arbitration, #2 Exhibit Exhibits A-E to Declaration, #3 Exhibit Exhibits F-L to Declaration) (SIMMONS, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC..(Frankel, Kevin) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Related Case section needs to be filled out. The Yes/No questions and Certification question asking if the case is/is not related need to be answered. The form also needs to be signed. (sbt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition to Compel Arbitration against KEVIN BODDIE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16973776.), filed by UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(SIMMONS, WILLIAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. BODDIE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | WILLIAM J. SIMMONS |
| Represented By: | Kevin Frankel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KEVIN BODDIE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
