BOYCE v. KARCH et al
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE |
OFFICER R. KARCH, OFFICER JOHN DOE, DESK SERGEANT JOHN DOE, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR, JONATHAN L. YOUNG, DAVID S. OWENS, CAPTAIN T. STALLINGS, CAPTAIN BLACKWELL and CAPTAIN R. FRANCESCHINI |
2:2023cv03809 |
September 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOHN M YOUNGE |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 PRO SE CASE TRANSFER LETTER SENT TO PRO SE. (sg) |
PAPER #5, #6 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
|
CASE TRANSFERRED TO DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. (sg) |
PAPER #4 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. NOT MAILED TO BOYCE. (fdc) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by JAY ROMAIN BOYCE. (fdc) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CAPTAIN BLACKWELL, CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER JOHN DOE, DESK SERGEANT JOHN DOE, CAPTAIN R. FRANCESCHINI, OFFICER R. KARCH, DAVID S. OWENS, DIRECTOR, CAPTAIN T. STALLINGS, KAREN TAYLOR, WARDEN, JONATHAN L. YOUNG, FREEHOLDER, filed by JAY ROMAIN BOYCE. *IFP PENDING*(fdc) Modified on 10/2/2023 (lisad, ). |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JAY ROMAIN BOYCE..(fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.