STREMMEL et al v. JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION et al
| PAMELA STREMMEL and RODGER STREMMEL |
| JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and FMC CORPORATION |
| 2:2023cv03870 |
| October 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS PAMELA AND RODGER STREMMEL'S MOTION TO REMAND IS GRANTED. THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, THE COURT FROM WHERE IT CAME; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 12/1/23.12/1/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal filed by PAMELA STREMMEL, RODGER STREMMEL. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit)(SMITH, BRADLEY) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal filed by PAMELA STREMMEL. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(SMITH, BRADLEY) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by FMC CORPORATION, JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Opposition)(BALLARD, ZACHARY) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal filed by FMC CORPORATION, JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION.Brief, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit)(BALLARD, ZACHARY) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by PAMELA STREMMEL, RODGER STREMMEL.Brief, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(SMITH, BRADLEY) |
| Filing 9 DEFENDANTS JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION ANDFMC CORPORATIONS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO TRANSFER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1404, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (JL) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY IS GRANTED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 10/30/23.10/30/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support of their Motion to Transfer filed by FMC CORPORATION, JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION.Certifcate of Service.(BALLARD, ZACHARY) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by PAMELA STREMMEL, RODGER STREMMEL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Brief, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Exhibit)(SMITH, BRADLEY) |
| Filing 5 State Court record received from Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. (CCP - Philadelphia County cv, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Transfer filed by FMC CORPORATION, JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION.Brief, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Brief)(BALLARD, ZACHARY) |
| Filing 3 Arbitration Certification that case exceeds the sum of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs or relief other than monetary damages is sought (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(SMITH, BRADLEY) |
| Filing 2 Letter re: Arbitration Certification (Attachments: #1 Arbitration Certification Form)(sbt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FMC CORPORATION, JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16989384), filed by FMC CORPORATION, JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION.(BALLARD, ZACHARY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
