FRANCIS v. SMITH et al
| GEORGE FRANCIS, JR. |
| QUINTA SMITH, LEON MACK, JEFFREY ABREU, JUDGE WILDEN H. DAVIS, JUDGE G. MICHAEL GREEN and JUDGE DEBORAH KRELL |
| 2:2023cv04063 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| KAREN S MARSTON |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT FRANCIS'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED. IF FRANCIS SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHALL REMIT $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF FRANCIS FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KAREN S. MARSTON ON 10/24/23. 10/25/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh)
|
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jaa, ) |
| Filing 3 Pro Se E-Notice Consent Form by GEORGE FRANCIS, JR consenting to e-notice at gfrancis0212@gmail.com (jaa, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JEFFREY ABREU, WILDEN H. DAVIS, G. MICHAEL GREEN, DEBORAH KRELL, LEON MACK, QUINTA SMITH, filed by GEORGE FRANCIS, JR. *IFP PENDING. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(jaa, ) Modified on 10/20/2023 (jaa, ). |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by GEORGE FRANCIS, JR.(jaa, ) Modified on 10/20/2023 (jaa, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
