Sampson v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Kyle Sampson |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Howard Hill, Andrew Frysiek, Danielle Outlaw, Louis Amadio and Cotoletta Fitler Square |
2:2023cv04076 |
October 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Louis Amadio, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Cotoletta Fitler Square, Andrew Frysiek, Howard Hill, Danielle Outlaw. Forwarded To: E-MAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 10/27/23 (JL) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FILE THE COMPLAINT AND ISSUE SUMMONS; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 10/27/23.10/27/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL) |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file Civil Cover Sheet and Designation Form in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. (nd) |
Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kyle Sampson..(RAYNOR, EARL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Parties, filed by Kyle Sampson.(RAYNOR, EARL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.