BRADLEY v. LYFT, INC. et al
JERRELL BRADLEY |
LYFT, INC., CRAIG BROWN, JR. and JOHN DOES 1-4 |
2:2023cv04342 |
November 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MIA ROBERTS PEREZ |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by LYFT, INC..(PERRY, ALLISON) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by LYFT, INC..(PERRY, ALLISON) |
DOC 3 MAILED TO BROWN (rf, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT COUNSEL CONTEMPLATING FILING A MOTION UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6), (E), OR (F), SHALL FIRST CONTACT OPPOSING COUNSEL TO DISCUSS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CONTEMPLATED MOTION AND TO PROVIDE AN PPORTUNITY TO CURE ANY ALLEGED PLEADING DEFICIENCIES OR STRIKE CERTAIN MATTER. THIS CONFERENCE SHALL TAKE PLACE AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS BEFORE THE FILING OF THE MOTION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MIA ROBERTS PEREZ ON 11/8/23. 11/8/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. UNREP NOT MAILED. (va) |
Filing 2 Letter re: Arbitration Certification (Attachments: #1 Arbitration Certification Form)(sbt) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by LYFT, INC. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-17057293), filed by LYFT, INC..(PERRY, ALLISON) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/7/2023) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.