RAHHAL v. META DIGITAL TRADE LTD et al
NASEEB RAHHAL |
ANA RAQUEL SANCHEZ, META DIGITAL TRADE LTD, ANA VANESSA, MR LEE RAMSEY and META LIMITED |
2:2023cv04371 |
November 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOHN R PADOVA |
JUAN R SANCHEZ |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER THAT RAHHAL'S REQUEST IS DENIED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 1/4/24. 1/4/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 7 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT PLAN by NASEEB RAHHAL. (rf, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying #1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 11/29/23.11/29/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA TO CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 11/16/2023. 11/17/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nd) |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES (rf, ) |
Filing 3 Pro Se E-Notice Consent Form by NASEEB RAHHAL consenting to e-notice at naseeb@bellsouth.net (rf, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against META DIGITAL TRADE LTD, META LIMITED, LEE RAMSEY, ANA RAQUEL SANCHEZ, filed by NASEEB RAHHAL. *IFP PENDING*(rf, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by NASEEB RAHHAL..(rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.