FAYYADH v. Kilolo
JAMAL FAYYADH |
Kijakazi Kilolo and KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
2:2023cv04707 |
November 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
RICHARD A LLORET |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Procedural Order 12/1/23 Entered and copies e-mailed. (JL) |
Filing 5 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 3 OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY ACTIONS UNDER 42 U.S.C. & 405 (g) BY ELECTRONIC MEANS VIA ("CM/ECF"); ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 11/30/23.12/1/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL) |
Service made electronically as to the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (JL) |
Filing 4 Social Security Magistrate Consent by JAMAL FAYYADH.. (TRAN, CHI) |
Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(JL) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JAMAL FAYYADH.Declaration. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(TRAN, CHI) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kijakazi Kilolo, filed by JAMAL FAYYADH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(TRAN, CHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.