De Jesus De La Cruz et al v. U.S. Citizenship And Immigration Services et al
| Raul De Jesus De La Cruz and Osvelia Marcial Nepomuceno |
| U.S. Citizenship And Immigration Services and Ur M. Jaddou |
| 2:2023cv04720 |
| November 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOEL H SLOMSKY |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (JL) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship And Immigration Services. Forwarded To: US ATTY on 12/1/23 (va) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship And Immigration Services. Forwarded To: Plaintiff's Counsel on 12/1/23 (va) (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/1/2023) (va). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UR MENDOZA JADDOU, USCIS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-17103205.), filed by Raul De Jesus De La Cruz, Osvelia Marcial Nepomuceno. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Exhibit A: Lead Plaintiff's I-918 Biometrics Notice, #4 Exhibit B: Plaintiff Marcial Nepomuceno's I-918A Receipt Notice, #5 Exhibit C: Plaintiffs' I-765 Receipt Notices)(Ryan, Brendan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
