HARRISON-EL v. DR. DOE et al
Case Number: 2:2023cv04725
Filed: March 1, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO AMEND THE DOCKET TO REFLECT THAT HARRISON-EL IS CURRENTLY HOUSED AT SCI SMITHFIELD UNDER INMATE NUMBER QQ1519. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SMITHFIELD. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND HARRISON-EL A BLANK CO PY OF THE COURT'S FORM COMPLAINT FOR A PRISONER FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. HARRISON-EL MAY USE THIS FORM TO FILE HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT IF HE CHOOSES TO DO SO, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEPARATELY DOCKET PAGES 1 AND 2 OF ECF NO. 7 AS "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECUSE." THE MOTION TO RECUSE IS DENIED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 3/1/24. 3/1/24 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE). (er)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARRISON-EL v. DR. DOE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?