HARRISON-EL v. DR. DOE et al
2:2023cv04725 |
March 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO AMEND THE DOCKET TO REFLECT THAT HARRISON-EL IS CURRENTLY HOUSED AT SCI SMITHFIELD UNDER INMATE NUMBER QQ1519. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SMITHFIELD. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND HARRISON-EL A BLANK CO PY OF THE COURT'S FORM COMPLAINT FOR A PRISONER FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. HARRISON-EL MAY USE THIS FORM TO FILE HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT IF HE CHOOSES TO DO SO, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEPARATELY DOCKET PAGES 1 AND 2 OF ECF NO. 7 AS "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECUSE." THE MOTION TO RECUSE IS DENIED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 3/1/24. 3/1/24 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE). (er) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HARRISON-EL v. DR. DOE et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.