MILLER v. NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY
| SOMMER MILLER |
| NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY |
| 2:2023cv04732 |
| November 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN F MURPHY |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice Re: Arbitration Video Conference. (Attachments: #1 Consent)(rv) |
Filing 7
ORDER THAT WE WILL HOLD AN INITIAL PRETRIAL VIDEOCONFERENCE VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS ON FEBRUARY 6, 2024 AT 12:00PM. WE WILL SEND A VIDEOCONFERENCE LINK BY E-MAIL TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD; IF THEY HAVE NOT ALREADY, ALL COUNSEL MUST REVIEW JUDGE MURPHYS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, AVAILABLE ON HIS PAGE ON THE COURTS WEBSITE; THE PARTIES SHALL ENGAGE IN EARLY, ONGOING, AND MEANINGFUL DISCOVERY PLANNING PROPORTIONAL TO THE NEEDS OF YOUR CASE TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO TIMELY FILE A RULE 26 REPORT; THE PARTIES MUST HOLD AN INITIAL RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE NO LATER THAN JANUARY 16, 2024; IF THEY HAVE NOT ALREADY, THE PARTIES SHALL EXCHANGE THE REQUIRED INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(A) ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 23, 2024; IF THE PARTIES HAVE NOT BEGUN DISCOVERY, THEN THE DISCOVERY PERIOD BEGINS ON JANUARY 23, 2024 AND THE PARTIES SHALL EXCHANGE WRITTEN DISCOVERY REQUESTS PROMPTLY THEREAFTER; ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN F MURPHY ON 1/5/24. 1/5/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)
|
| Filing 6 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY.(TUSKAN, JUSTIN) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY.(TUSKAN, JUSTIN) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Chad Spotts re: served Complaint and Summons upon Steve Kusic, CEO by Personal on 12/06/2023 (MILLER, SOMMER) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY. Forwarded To: Plaintiff's Counsel on 12/1/23 (va) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by SOMMER MILLER (MILLER, SOMMER) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17104349.), filed by SOMMER MILLER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(MILLER, SOMMER) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Yes/No questions need to be answered. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MILLER v. NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SOMMER MILLER | |
| Represented By: | SOMMER MILLER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY | |
| Represented By: | JUSTIN M. TUSKAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
