FOSTER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
IVAN FOSTER |
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, JOHN DOES and JIM DOES |
2:2023cv04820 |
December 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
KELLEY BRISBON HODGE |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KELLEY BRISBON HODGE ON 1/8/24. 1/8/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM SIGNED BY HONORABLE KELLEY BRISBON HODGE ON 1/8/24. 1/8/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by IVAN FOSTER..(va) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. E-MAILED TO FOSTER. (fdc) |
Filing 2 Pro Se E-Notice Consent Form by IVAN FOSTER consenting to e-notice at iftycon6@gmail.com (fdc) Modified on 12/7/2023 (md). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JIM DOES, JOHN DOES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, filed by IVAN FOSTER. *FILING FEE NOT PAID/NO IFP FILED*(fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.