RAMEY v. LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C.
| MARQUIS RAMEY |
| LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C. |
| 2:2023cv05089 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by MARQUIS RAMEY. Envelope. (va) |
| MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #6 #7 TO PLAINTIFF ON 2/7/24. (jaa, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #4 MOTION FOR IFP. MARQUIS RAMEY, #MP-3121, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI BENNER TOWNSHIP. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE COURTS ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, RAMEYS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B)(II). THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 2/6/24. 2/6/24 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va)
|
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 2/6/24. 2/6/24 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va) |
| Copy of #7 Order faxed to SCI Brenner. (va) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by MARQUIS RAMEY. (sg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MARQUIS RAMEY..(sg) (Main Document 4 replaced on 2/2/2024) (sg). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING SUBMITTED COMPLAINT WITH THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, PLAINTIFF MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $405 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 1/16/24. 1/16/24 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. (amas)
|
| DOC. NO. 3, ALONG WITH PRISONER IFP FORM, MAILED TO PRO SE ON 1/16/2024. (md) |
| DOC. NO. #2 MAILED TO PRO SE ON 12/29/23. (amas) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE)(amas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C., filed by MARQUIS RAMEY.(FEE NOT PAID, NO IFP FILED)(amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RAMEY v. LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MARQUIS RAMEY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
